Recommendations by the Uruguayan Society of Intensive Care on the Covid-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29193/RMU.37.1.10Keywords:
PANDEMIC, COVID-19, BIOETHICS, CRITICAL CAREAbstract
Introduction: the pandemic caused by SARS-CoV2 constitutes a significant challenge for the health system, and especially for Critical Care Units, so we need to prepare in many aspects. Likewise, we need to consider there could be an extraordinary demand for beds in critical care units, what would lead to an imbalance between clinical needs and the effective availability of health resources. Objectives: the study aims to perform a bioethical analysis that could provide guidelines for the assistance of patients in critical care. Specific objectives: 1) to analyse the main bioethical principles in this context, 2) to support clinicians in the making of difficult decisions, 3) to make the resource allocation criteria specific, 4) to define action lines upon a potential “health’s disastrous” scenario
Method: the Uruguayan Society of Intensive Care has generated a space for collective work based on discussion processes. Documents include a bibliographic review and the existing protocols. Results: the study presents a theoretical analysis that is backed up by the bioethical principles involved in the pandemic context on the scenarios of demand for assistance and, by the arguments calling for a change in the ethical criteria upon the saturation of the health system. Conclusion: practical recommendations are made: 1) for the making of decisions about admission and discharge in a controlled demand. 2) to define action criteria upon an increase in demand, clearly defining the different scenarios, 3) to apply upon the saturation of the health system.
References
(2) Ley 18.335. Pacientes y usuarios de los servicios de salud: se establecen sus derechos y obligaciones. Montevideo, 26 de agosto de 2008. Disponible en: http://www.bps.gub.uy/ bps/file/8261/1/ley_18335_-_pacientes_y_usuarios_de_los_servicios_de_salud.pdf. (Consulta:22 mayo 2020).
(3) Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principios de ética biomédica. Barcelona: Masson, 1999.
(4) Pellegrino E. Moral choice, the good of the patient, and the patient’s good. En: Moskop J,Kopelman L, eds. Ethics and critical care medicine. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 19. Basel: Springer Nature, 1985:117-38.
(5) Gracia D. De la bioética clínica a la bioética global: treinta años de evolución. Acta Bioeth 2002; 8(1):27-39.
(6) American Medical Association. Code of medical ethics.Disponible en: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering- care/ethics/code-medical-ethics-overview (Consulta: 22 mayo 2020).
(7) Beca JP. Problemas éticos en situaciones de catástrofes. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Bioética de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad del Desarrollo, 2010. Disponible en: https://medicina.udd.cl/centro-bioetica/files/2010/10/parral.pdf. (Consulta: 22 mayo 2020).
(8) Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias. Grupo de Trabajo de Bioética. Recomendaciones éticas para la toma de decisiones en la situación excepcional de crisis por pandemia Covid-19 en las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Madrid: SEMICYUC, 2020. Disponible en: https://semicyuc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/%C3 %89tica_SEMICYUC-COVID-19.pdf. (Consulta:22 mayo 2020).
(9) Gómez-Batiste X, Martínez-Muñoz M, Blay C, Amblàs J, Vila L, Costa X, et al. Recomendaciones para la atención integral e integrada de personas con enfermedades o condiciones crónicas avanzadas y pronóstico de vida limitado en servicios de salud y sociales: NECPAL-CCOMICO©3.0 (2016). Barcelona: Institut Català d’ Oncologia, 2016. Disponible en: http://ico.gencat.cat/web/.content/minisite/ico/professionals/documents/qualy/arxius/NECPAL-3.0- ESPANOL_completo.pdf. (Consulta: 22 mayo 2020).
(10) Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan D, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
(11) National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-19 rapid guidelines: critical care. London: NICE, 2020. Disponible en:www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng159. (Consulta: 22 mayo 2020).
(12) Duems Noriega O. Valoración de la fragilidad: aspecto fundamental en el paciente crítico. RevEspGeriatrGerontol 2018; 53(6):362-6.
(13) Sprung C, Joynt G, Christian M, Truog R, Rello J, Nates J. Adult ICU Triage During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: who will live and who will die? Recommendations to Improve Survival. Crit Care Med 2020;48(8): 1196-202.
(14) White D, Lo B. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020;323(18):1773-4.
(15) Vergano M, Bertolini G, Giannini A, Gristina G, Livigni S, Mistraletti G, et al. Raccomandazioni di ética clínica per l’ammissione a trattamentiintensivi e per la loro sospensione, in condizioni eccezionali di squilibrio tra necessità e risorse disponibili. Roma: Società Italiana di Anestesia Analgesia Rianimazione e Terapia Intensiva, 2020. Disponible en: http://www.siaarti.it/SiteAssets/News/COVID19 %20-%20documenti%20SIAARTI/SIAARTI%20-%20Covid19%20-%20Raccomandazioni%20di%20etica%20clinica.pdf. (Consulta:22 mayo 2020).
(16) Cluzet O, Berro G. La pandemia de COVID-19: consideraciones éticas y médico-legales. Revisado por la Comisión de Asesoramiento Bioético de la Federación Médica del Interior. Montevideo: FEMI, 2020. Disponible en: https:// c6c493a3-18e5-4bd1-92b4-dc602742389c.filesusr.com/ ugd/222cdb_a6ab0c8820d9480c9fbf0e857e35ced3.pdf. (Consulta: 22 mayo 2020).
(17) Emanuel E, Persad G, Upshur R, Thome B, Parker M, Glickman A, et al. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(21):2049-55.