Scheduled correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and allograft arthrodesis

Authors

  • Miguel Karsaclian Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica de Traumatología y Ortopedia Pediátrica, Ex Profesor Adjunto
  • Alejandro Cúneo Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica de Traumatología y Ortopedia Pediátrica, Profesor Adjunto
  • Sergio Rodríguez Severo Uruguay, Ministerio de Salud Pública, Traumatólogo Asistente
  • Mario Schimchak Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica de Traumatología y Ortopedia Pediátrica, Profesor
  • Olga Wodowóz Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica de Traumatología y Ortopedia Pediátrica., Ex Asistente
  • Inés Álvarez Instituto Nacional de Donación y Trasplante de Células, Tejidos y Órganos, Directora

Keywords:

SCOLIOSIS, HOMOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION, SPINAL FUSION, ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICES, POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS, ADOLESCENT

Abstract

Introduction: therapeutic management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is complex. Global standards have been defined based on the angular values of the spinal curves, their progressivity and skeletal maturity. Values higher than previously set control values or failure to respond to orthotic treatment determine that the treatment option for scoliosis should be instrumented arthrosesis or reduction of curvature deformity.
Objectives: to assess the results and benefits of instrumented correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by correcting deformity using the Lea Plaza sublaminar frame as instrumentation and arthrodesis with bank allograft provided by the Instituto Nacional de Donación y Trasplante de Células, Tejidos y Órganos (INDT) (National Institute for the Donation and Transplantation of Cells, Tissues and Organs).
Method: we conducted a retrospective review of a series of 15 patients, carriers of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent surgery at the Servicio de Ortopedia Infantil del Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell (Pereira Rossell Hospital Children’s Orthopedic Service) between November 2001 and December 2005, with an average 25-month post-surgery follow-up. In all cases, the instrumentation using the Lea Plaza sublaminar frame was performed with human cadaver allograft.
Conclusions: in 12 cases, double curve patterns evidenced type II or type I King thoracic curves with 65º and 40º maximum and minimum values and maximum and minimum lumbar values of 68º and 24º. The average corrective level for thoracic curvature was 20º and 19º for the lumbar curvature. In one case, a 58º initial thoracic-lumbar angular level dropped to 22º. Two cases corresponded to dextroconvex thoracic curves. In one patient, where the initial angle was 50º, it was reduced to 25º, and a 70º value was reduced to 10º in the other patient.

References

(1) Lea Plaza C. The Lea-Plaza frame for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1994; 25(2): 321-31.
(2) Lea Plaza C, Vin Vivo E, Silveri A, Bermudez W, Santo J, Carreras O. Surgical correction of scoliosis with a new three-dimensional device, the "Lea Plaza Frame". A preliminary report. Spine 1992; 17(3): 365-72.
(3) Lea Plaza C, Karsaclian M, Rocca C. Segmental scoliosis correlation: use of the Lea Plaza Frame. Spine 2004; 29(4): 398-404.
(4) Trasplante de órganos y tejidos se establecen normas para su realización con fines científicos o terapéuticos. Ley 14.005 del 17 de agosto de 1971. (Diario Oficial, nº 1862220, 20 de agosto 1971). Trasplantes de órganos y tejidos modificación de la ley Nº 14.005. Ley 17.668 del 15 de julio de 2003. (Diario Oficial, nº 26302, 23 de julio de 2003). Creación del "Banco Nacional de Organos y Tejidos". Decreto nº 86/977 del 24 de febrero de 1977.
(5) Modificación de la denominación Banco Nacional de Órganos y Tejidos a Instituto Nacional de Donación Transplante de Células, Tejidos y Organos. Decreto nº 248/005 del 8 de agosto de 2005.
(6) Vanzelle C, Stagnara P, Jouvinroux P. Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1973; 93: 173.
(7) Álvarez I, Saldias M, Wodowoz O, Pérez Campos H, Machín D, Silva W, et al. Progress of National Multi-tissue Bank in Uruguay in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Tissue Banking Programme. Cell Tissue Bank 2003; 4(2-4): 173-9.
(8) Iturria M, Wodowóz O, Zeballos J, Álvarez I, Bologna A. Preliminary determination of lyophilization temperature – time curves for human bone allografts. Cell Tissue Bank 2005; 6: 149-60.
(9) King H, Moe J, Bradford D, Winter RB. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65(9): 1302-13.
(10) Lenke L, Betz R, Harms J, Bridwell K, Clements D, Lowe T, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A(8): 1169-81.
(11) Jones K, Andrish J, Kuivila T, Gurd A. Radiographic outcomes using cancellous allograft bone for posterior spinal fusion in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2002; 22(3): 285-9.
(12) Stricker S, Sher J. Freeze-dried cortical allograft in posterior spinal arthrodesis: use with segmental instrumentation for idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Orthopedics 1997; 20(11): 1039-43.
(13) Blanco J, Sears C. Allograft bone use during instrumentation and fusion in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997; 22(12): 1338-42.
(14) Dodd C, Fergusson C, Freedman L, Houghton GR, Thomas D. Allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 70(3): 431-4.
(15) Aurori B, Weierman R, Lowell H, Nadel C, Parsons J. Pseudoarthrosis after spinal fusion for scoliosis.A comparison of autogeneic and allogeneic bone grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (199): 153-8.
(16) Price C, Connolly J, Carantzas A, Ilyas I. Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003; 28(8): 793-8.

Published

2007-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Karsaclian M, Cúneo A, Rodríguez Severo S, Schimchak M, Wodowóz O, Álvarez I. Scheduled correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and allograft arthrodesis. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2007 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];23(4):233-41. Available from: https://revista.rmu.org.uy/index.php/rmu/article/view/599

Most read articles by the same author(s)