Decentralization of the teaching-learning scenarios of the postgraduate studies in Gynecology
Experience of the Gynecotocology Clinic A
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29193/RMU.35.3.9Keywords:
POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION, CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATIONAbstract
The Gynecotocology Clinic A (GCA) of the School of the School of Medicine is committed to the goals set in the health reform in terms of the training of postgraduates, and thus has focused on the decentralization of the educational scenario. This study presents the decentralization strategy in the training of postgraduate students in gynecotocology of the GCA between 2010 and 2018. It describes the tools that allow keeping in touch with the posgraduate students and tutors by means of technology that regularly aids grand rounds, tutorial activities, remote clinics, etc. Also, a description of the distribution of achievements by psotgraduates is provided, as well as the achievement of skills in the different Associated Teaching Centers (CEDAs in Spanish). Upon the assessment of performance of the CEDAs network of CGA, as well as the educational achievements in human resources, a conclusion is drawn as to the feasibility of increasing the number of postgraduates trained in gynecotocology appealing to structured decentralization strategies for the learning scenario.
References
(1) Universidad de la República del Uruguay. Misión de la Facultad de Medicina. Disponible en: http://www.fmed.edu.uy/ institucional/mision. (Consulta: 20 noviembre 2018).
(2) Uruguay. Poder Legislativo. Ley n° 18211. Sistema Nacional Integrado de Salud (13 de diciembre de 2007). Disponible en: https://legislativo.parlamento.gub.uy/temporales/leytemp6103585.htm (Consulta: 20 diciembre 2018).
(3) Sollazzo A, Berterretche R. El Sistema Nacional Integrado de Salud en Uruguay y los desafíos para la Atención Primaria. Ciênc saúde coletiva 2011; 16(6): 2829-40. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232011000600021.
(4) Uruguay. IMPO. Ley n° 19301. Régimen de residencias médicas hospitalarias. Disponible en: https://www. impo.com.uy/bases/leyes/19301-2014. (Consulta: 12 setiembre de 2018).
(5) Nozar F, Fiol V, Coppola F, Briozzo L. Programa de formación del postgrado de la Clínica Ginecotocológica A. Montevideo: Oficina del Libro-FEFMUR, 2011.
(6) Universidad de la República del Uruguay. Facultad de Medicina. Proyecto ECHO Uruguay. Disponible en: https://drive.goole.com/file/d/ 0B4XzBGF1CkbKMEx3a0t1b3V2djg/view (Consulta: 27 junio 2018).
(7) Albanese MA, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: a review of the literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad méd 1993; 68(1):52-81.
(8) Campos A. Las cuatro ruedas del carro de la excelencia. Desafíos y limitaciones en la educación médica. Educ méd 2016; 17(3):88-93.
(9) Millán Núñez-Cortés J, Civeira-Murillo F, Gutiérrez-Fuentes JA. El hospital universitario del siglo XXI. Educ méd 2011; 14: 83-9.
(10) Byrne L, Holt K, Richter T, Miller R, Nasca T. Tracking residents through multiple residency programs: a different approach for measuring residents’ rates of continuing graduate medical education in ACGME-accredited programs. J Grad Med Educ 2010; 2(4):616-23. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-10-00105.1.
(11) Norman G. Research in medical education: three decades of progress. BMJ 2002; 324(7353):1560-2.
(12) Alves de Lima A. Investigación en educación médica: un análisis sobre conceptos básicos. Rev Hosp Ital B.Aires 2007; 27(1):1-6.
