Modified snorkeling facemasks for safe application of non-invasive ventilation
A pilot study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29193/RMU.37.4.1Keywords:
NONINVASIVE VENTILATION, DIVING MASKS, COVID-19Abstract
Introduction: within the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, different authors proposed adaptations to snorkeling masks available in the market (modified masks: MM) to provide oxygen therapy with positive pressure ventilation or not. Until today, none of them has assessed its performance as an interface for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the inspiratory pressure support mode.
Objective: to develop an interface of NIV using MM and assess its performance with a conventional full mask.
Method: the MM were adapted as NIV interfaces using two pieces created by 3D printing. Their performance was compared to a that of a conventional mask in 10 healthy volunteers in inspiratory pressure support (3 cmH2O) mode with two levels of positive pressure towards the end of expiration (PEEP 4 and 8 cmH2O). The following were compared: system leaks, respiratory rate, normal volume, pulse oximetry, transcutaneous carbon dioxide and comfort.
Results: with 4 cmH2O of PEEP, no significant differences were found between masks in none of the variables studied. With 8 cmH2O de PEEP, the use of MM were associated to a lower level of CO2tc (41.0±5.7 vs 43.5±8.1 mmHg; p=0.03) and greater comfort (8.3±1.1 vs 6.5±1.4; p<0.01) than conventional masks (CM).
Conclusions: in healthy volunteers, MM for NIV evidence a similar performance than that of standard oronasal masks, and have a further advantage, as they are more comfortable and cheaper. Even if further studies are needed to support its use, modified snorkeling masks could represent a valid option during the health emergency caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in consideration of the scarce interfaces available in the market.
References
2) Gregoretti C, Confalonieri M, Navalesi P, Squadrone V, Frigerio P, Beltrame F, et al. Evaluation of patient skin breakdown and comfort with a new face mask for non-invasive ventilation: a multi-center study. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28(3):278-84.
3) Belchior I, Gonçalves M, Winck J. Continuous noninvasive ventilation delivered by a novel total face mask: a case series report. Respir Care 2012; 57(3):449-53.
4) Pérez-Mañanes R, García de San José S, Desco-Menéndez M, Sánchez-Arcilla I, González-Fernández E, Vaquero-Martín J, et al. Point-of-care 3D printing during the COVID-19 pandemic. What role does the manufacturing university hospital play? Res Sq 2020; 1:1-17. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-34063/v1.
5) Germonpre P, Van Rompaey D, Balestra C. Evaluation of Protection level, respiratory safety, and practical aspects of commercially available snorkel masks as personal protection devices against aerosolized contaminants and SARS-CoV2. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(12):4347. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124347.
6) Greig P, Carvalho C, El-Boghdadly K, Ramessur S. Safety testing improvised COVID-19 personal protective equipment based on a modified full-face snorkel mask. Anaesthesia 2020; 75(7):970-1.
7) Guan L, Zhou L, Zhang J, Peng W, Chen R. More awareness is needed for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2019 transmission through exhaled air during non-invasive respiratory support: experience from China. Eur Respir J 2020; 55(3):2000352. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00352-2020.
8) Hui D, Chow B, Lo T, Tsang O, Ko F, Ng S, et al. Exhaled air dispersion during high-flow nasal cannula therapy versus CPAP via different masks. Eur Respir J 2019; 53(4):1802339. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02339-2018.
9) Kechli M, Lerman J, Ross M. Modifying a full-face snorkel mask to meet n95 respirator standards for use with coronavirus disease 2019 patients. A A Pract 2020; 14(7):e01237. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001237.
10) Vicini C, Cammaroto G, Meccariello G, Iannella G, Fragale M, Cacco T, et al. Overview of different modified full-face snorkelling masks for intraoperative protection. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2020; 40(5):317-24. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N0841.
11) Thierry B, Célérier C, Simon F, Lacroix C, Khonsari R. How and why use the EasyBreath® surface snorkeling mask as a personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic? Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2020; 137(4):329-31. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2020.05.006.
12) Landry S, Mann D, Djumas L, Messineo L, Terrill P, Thomson L, et al. Laboratory performance of oronasal CPAP and adapted snorkel masks to entrain oxygen and CPAP. Respirology 2020; 25(12):1309-12.