10 years after the anesthetic-surgical health emergency in Uruguay

Comparison of the results of the current offer with that projected in 2011

Authors

  • Fiorella Cavalleri Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social, Profesora Adjunta. Licenciada en estadística
  • Juan Pablo Bouchacourt Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Anestesiología, Profesor Agregado
  • Beatriz Noya Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Anestesiología, Profesora Agregada
  • Laura Illescas Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Anestesiología, Profesora Agregada
  • Ana Rodríguez Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Anestesiología, Profesora Agregada
  • Pablo Castromán Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Anestesiología, Profesor Agregado
  • Juan Riva Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Anestesiología, Profesor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29193/RMU.37.2.12

Keywords:

ANESTHESIOLOGY, ANESTHESIOLOGISTS, WORKFORCE, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, PHYSICIANS DISTRIBUTION

Abstract

Introduction: during 2011 a simulation method was proposed to assess the needs and trends over time of anesthesiologists and establish possible scenarios.
Objective. compare the current situation with the projections formulated in 2011 by the simulation method to evaluate anesthesiologists’ supply and demand.
Material and methods: an update of the available databases was revised. The number and demographic distribution of the anesthesiologist workforce were recorded and compared with the proposed scenarios.
Results: the number of physicians with anesthesiology skills was 14.2/100.000, and wholly trained anesthesiologists were 12/100.000. The age distribution presented a median of 54 years, the central 90% were between 36 and 75 years old. 57% of the anesthesiologist are females. 21.8 workforce in anesthesiology/100.000 corresponds to Montevideo and the metropolitan area, against 7/100.000 in the rest of the country. There was an average increase of 50% in the number of positions for training, an increase in revalidation applications, and a rise of 17.5% in a surgical procedure in the public subsector.
Conclusions: the prediction of the number of anesthesiologists and their characteristics for 2020 coincided with two of the proposed scenarios. We verify a growth in female participation, a higher percentage in younger age groups, centralization of human resources in Montevideo and higher retirement age. The main limitation was access to reliable information.

References

1) Ley 18.711. Emergencia sanitaria de la asistencia anestésico quirúrgica. Montevideo, 30 de diciembre de 2010. Disponible en: https://legislativo.parlamento.gub.uy/temporales/leytemp5349551.htm [Consulta: 27 noviembre 2020].
2) Uruguay. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Sistema Nacional Integrado de Salud. División RRHH. Estimación de las necesidades de anestesistas. Montevideo, 2012. Disponible en: www.msp.gub.uy/andocasociado.aspx?7072,23955.[Consulta: 24 setiembre 2020].
3) Cavalleri F, Castromán P, Rodríguez A, Riva J. Utilidad de un método estadístico de simulación para evaluar la oferta y demanda de anestesiólogos en Uruguay (2011-2025). Propuesta para prospección y planificación de necesidad de recursos humanos en Anestesiología. Rev Méd Urug 2013; 29(3):165-73.
4) Schubert A, Eckhout G, Tremper K. An updated view of the national anesthesia personnel shortfall. Anesth Analg 2003; 96(1):207-14.
5) Centre for Workforce Intelligence. Review of the anaesthetics and intensive care medicine workforce. London, 2015. Disponible en: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-the-anaesthetics-and-intensive-care-medicine-workforce[Consulta: 2 noviembre 2020].
6) Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Estimaciones y proyecciones de población. Montevideo, 2013. Disponible en: https://www.ine.gub.uy/estimaciones-y-proyecciones.[Consulta: 3 setiembre 2020].
7) Frau A. Informe sobre impacto en los egresos de las políticas de admisión y la tendencia emigratoria en especialidades quirúrgicas. Montevideo: UdelaR. Facultad de Medicina. Escuela de Graduados, 2009. Exp. Nº 070649-000320-09.
8) Grogono AW. National resident matching program results for 2005: slight increase in recruitment. ASA Newsl 2005; 69(5):20-33.
9) Kheterpal S, Tremper KK, Shanks A, Morris M. Six-year follow-up on work force and finances of the United States anesthesiology training programs: 2000 to 2006. Anesth Analg 2009; 108(1):263-72.
10) Egger Halbeis CB, Macario A. Factors affecting supply and demand of anesthesiologists in Western Europe. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006;19(2):207-12.
11) Weissman C, Eidelman LA, Pizov R, Matot I, Klein N, Cohn R. The Israeli anesthesiology physician workforce. Isr Med Assoc J 2006; 8(4):255-9.
12) Katzenstein Berro J, Saralegui Coli J, Ayala Cauterucci W. Situación laboral de la anestesiología en Uruguay: percepción de los anestesiólogos. Análisis y propuestas. Anest Analg Reanim 2010; 23(2):40-50.
13) Fondo Nacional de Recursos. Estadísticas e Informes. Disponible en: http://www.fnr.gub.uy/estadisticas [Consulta: 18 agosto 2020].
14) Ley 19.301. Régimen de residencias medicas hospitalarias. Montevideo, 8 de enero de 2015. Disponible en: https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/leyes/19301-2014 [Consulta: 3 setiembre 2020].

Published

2021-06-10

How to Cite

1.
Cavalleri F, Bouchacourt JP, Noya B, Illescas L, Rodríguez A, Castromán P, et al. 10 years after the anesthetic-surgical health emergency in Uruguay: Comparison of the results of the current offer with that projected in 2011. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 10 [cited 2024 Sep. 7];37(2):e37213. Available from: https://revista.rmu.org.uy/index.php/rmu/article/view/713

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>