Tetheral spinal cord surgery including neurophysiological assessment

Authors

  • Carlos Aboal Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Neurología, Neurocirugía, Profesor Adjunto
  • Daniel Wilson Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Neurología, Neurocirugía, Residente
  • Daniel Cibils Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Neurología, Neurofisiología, Profesor Agregado
  • Aurana Erman Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Neurología, Neurocirugía, Asistente
  • Magdalena Penela Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto de Neurología, Neurofisiología, Asistente

Keywords:

NEURAL TUBE DEFECTS, INTRAOPERATIVE MONITORING

Abstract

Tethered spinal cord syndrome (MA) includes a group of pathological conditions that determine that the conus medullaris was in an unusually lower level and fixed, in a relative state of immobility.
Confusing anatomo-surgical conditions are regularly found when surgeries of lumbar and sacral spinal disraphic injuries are on course.
In some cases, roots are enclosed by the arachnoid, simulating a thick filum terminale; in other cases, the transition between a functional but structurally distorted conus and a lipoma of the filum may not be clear: neurological function may be at risk in case of section procedures solely using morphological criteria. This leads not only to an increase of morbility, but also to the permanence of the pathologic disorder.
Surgery –using a neurophysiologic intrasurgical record– of myotomes of sacral and lumbar roots before the section of the tether process, filum terminale or other, enables to distinguish neurologic structures (roots or conus medullaris) from non-functional structures (as filum terminale) or other pathologic processes (lipoma, etc.) and preserve the neurologic structures.
A clinical case of a 9 year-old child that carries the disease since birth is presented. She underwent surgery –using a neurophysiologic intrasurgical record– by which symptomatology was partially reverted back.

References

1) Fitz CR, Harwood-Nash DC. The tethered conus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1975; 125: 515-23.
2) von-Koch C, Quinones A, Gulati M, Lyon R, Peacock W, Yingling C. Clinical outcome in children undergoing tethered cord release utilizing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Pediatr Neurosurg 2002; 37: 81-6.
3) Kothbauer K, Novak K. Intraoperative monitoring for tethered cord surgery: an update. Neurosug Focus 2004; 16(2): 1-5.
4) French BN. Midline fusion defects and defects formation. In: Youmans JR ed. Neurological Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders,1990; 1183-5.
5) Hoffman H. Indications and treatment of the tethered spinal cord. In: AANS. Tethered cord sindrome. Park Ridge: Karger, 1996; 21-8.
6) Yamada S, Zinke DE, Sanders D. Pathophysiology of "tethered cord syndrome". J Neurosurg 1981; 54: 494-503.

Published

2006-05-31

How to Cite

1.
Aboal C, Wilson D, Cibils D, Erman A, Penela M. Tetheral spinal cord surgery including neurophysiological assessment. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2006 May 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];22(2):152-6. Available from: https://revista.rmu.org.uy/index.php/rmu/article/view/775

Most read articles by the same author(s)