Validation of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) in Uruguay
Keywords:
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, EVALUATIONAbstract
Evaluation is a fundamental component of the management process and potential source of inputs for the improvement of processes in general and quality and results in particular.
If one takes into account that the change in the model proposed by the health reform in Uruguay depends largely on the proper development of the First Level of Care, the importance of assessing the gaps between what was said and what was done at this level seems relevant.
Prof. Barbara Starfield, a world reference in the analysis and evaluation of health systems, developed from her work space at John Hopkins Unversity, a tool for the evaluation of the First Level of Care, the Primary Care Assessment Tool, known as PCAT, available since the last decade of the twentieth century.
References
(1) Starfield B. New Paradigms for quality in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51(465): 303-9.
(2) Cassady CE, Starfield B, Hurtado MP, Berk RA, Nanda JP, Friedenberg LA. Measuring consumer experiences with primary care. Pediatrics 2000; 105(4 Pt 2): 998-1003.
(3) Elias PE, Whitaker C, Góis MC, Cohn A, Kishima V, Escribao A, et al. Atençao Básica em Saúde: comparaçao entre PFS e UBS por estrato de esclusao social no municipio de Sao Paulo. Ciênc saúde coletiva 2006; 11(3): 633-41.
(4) Shi L, Starfield B, Xu J. Validating the Adult Primary Care Assessment Tool. J Fam Pract 2001; 50(2): 161.
(5) Lee JH, Choi YJ, Sung NJ, Kim SY, Chung SH, Kim J, Jeon TH, Park HK, Korean Primary Care Research Group. Development of the Korean primary care assessment tool-measuring user experience: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Int J Qual Health Care 2009; 21(2): 103-11.
(6) Harzheim E, Duncan BB, Stein AT, Cunha CR, Goncalves MR, Trindade TG, et al. Quality and effectiveness of different approaches to primary care delivery in Brazil. BMC Health Serv Res 2006, 6: 156.
(7) Harzheim E, Starfield B, Rajmil L, Alvarez-Dardet C, Stein AT. Internal consistency and reliability of Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool-Brasil) for child health services. Cad Saúde Pública 2006; 22(8): 1649-59.
(8) Macinko J, Almeida C, Oliveira E. Avaliaçao das características organizacionais dos serviços de atençao básica em Petrópolis: teste de uma metodología. Saúde debate 2003; 27(65): 243-56.
(9) Van Stralen Cornelis Johannes, Belisário Soraya Almeida, Van Stralen Terezinha Berenice de Sousa, Lima Ângela Maria Dayrell de, Massote Alice Werneck, Oliveira Cláudia di Lorenzo. Percepçao dos usuários e profissionais de saúde sobre atençao básica: comparaçao entre unidades com e sem saúde da familia na Regiao Centro-Oeste do Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2008; 24 (supl 1): S148-58.
(10) Pasarín MI, Berra S, Rajmil L, Solans M, Borrell C, Starfield B. Un instrumento para la evaluación de la atención primaria de salud desde la perspectiva de la población. Aten Primaria 2007; 39(8): 395-401.
(11) Ponzo J. Informe del seminario internacional sobre evaluación en el primer nivel de atención, Montevideo, 3-5 noviembre 2010: adjunto al Acta de la Segunda Reunión 2010 del Comité Académico de APS, AUGM. Disponible en: http://www.grupomontevideo.edu.uy/docs/Comites_Academicos/Atencion_Primaria_de_la_Salud/informe%20del%20 seminario%20internacional%20sobre%20 evaluacin%20en%20el%20primer%20nivel%20de% 20atencin.pdf. Consulta: 26 junio 2011.
(2) Cassady CE, Starfield B, Hurtado MP, Berk RA, Nanda JP, Friedenberg LA. Measuring consumer experiences with primary care. Pediatrics 2000; 105(4 Pt 2): 998-1003.
(3) Elias PE, Whitaker C, Góis MC, Cohn A, Kishima V, Escribao A, et al. Atençao Básica em Saúde: comparaçao entre PFS e UBS por estrato de esclusao social no municipio de Sao Paulo. Ciênc saúde coletiva 2006; 11(3): 633-41.
(4) Shi L, Starfield B, Xu J. Validating the Adult Primary Care Assessment Tool. J Fam Pract 2001; 50(2): 161.
(5) Lee JH, Choi YJ, Sung NJ, Kim SY, Chung SH, Kim J, Jeon TH, Park HK, Korean Primary Care Research Group. Development of the Korean primary care assessment tool-measuring user experience: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Int J Qual Health Care 2009; 21(2): 103-11.
(6) Harzheim E, Duncan BB, Stein AT, Cunha CR, Goncalves MR, Trindade TG, et al. Quality and effectiveness of different approaches to primary care delivery in Brazil. BMC Health Serv Res 2006, 6: 156.
(7) Harzheim E, Starfield B, Rajmil L, Alvarez-Dardet C, Stein AT. Internal consistency and reliability of Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool-Brasil) for child health services. Cad Saúde Pública 2006; 22(8): 1649-59.
(8) Macinko J, Almeida C, Oliveira E. Avaliaçao das características organizacionais dos serviços de atençao básica em Petrópolis: teste de uma metodología. Saúde debate 2003; 27(65): 243-56.
(9) Van Stralen Cornelis Johannes, Belisário Soraya Almeida, Van Stralen Terezinha Berenice de Sousa, Lima Ângela Maria Dayrell de, Massote Alice Werneck, Oliveira Cláudia di Lorenzo. Percepçao dos usuários e profissionais de saúde sobre atençao básica: comparaçao entre unidades com e sem saúde da familia na Regiao Centro-Oeste do Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2008; 24 (supl 1): S148-58.
(10) Pasarín MI, Berra S, Rajmil L, Solans M, Borrell C, Starfield B. Un instrumento para la evaluación de la atención primaria de salud desde la perspectiva de la población. Aten Primaria 2007; 39(8): 395-401.
(11) Ponzo J. Informe del seminario internacional sobre evaluación en el primer nivel de atención, Montevideo, 3-5 noviembre 2010: adjunto al Acta de la Segunda Reunión 2010 del Comité Académico de APS, AUGM. Disponible en: http://www.grupomontevideo.edu.uy/docs/Comites_Academicos/Atencion_Primaria_de_la_Salud/informe%20del%20 seminario%20internacional%20sobre%20 evaluacin%20en%20el%20primer%20nivel%20de% 20atencin.pdf. Consulta: 26 junio 2011.
Downloads
Published
2011-09-30
How to Cite
1.
PCAT.UY G, Pizzanelli M, Ponzo J, Buglioli M, Toledo A, Casinelli M, et al. Validation of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) in Uruguay. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2011 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];27(3):187-9. Available from: https://revista.rmu.org.uy/index.php/rmu/article/view/387
Issue
Section
Letters to the Editor
