Clinical practice guidelines

Looking for evidence

Authors

  • Edgardo Sandoya Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Cátedra de Cardiología, Postgrado de Cardiología, Curso de Investigación Clínica, Coordinador. Centro Latinoamericano de Economía Humana (CLAEH), Maestría de Política y Gestión de Salud, Docente. Universidad Católica, Facultad de Enfermería y Tecnologías de la Salud, Postgrado de Gestión de los Servicios de Salud, Docente. Universidad de Montevideo, Centro de Ciencias Biomédicas, Ex docente

Keywords:

CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDE, EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE

Abstract

Introduction: clinical practice guidelines based on evidence constitute a tool to provide quality health care services from the individual and social perspective, and at the same time, they provide physicians with backup. Accepting guidelines without questioning them is a deeply rooted phenomenon in our country – when they come from prestigious international organizations.
Objective: to demonstrate that in cardiology we need to have nationally prepared guidelines that enable the best handling of our patients.
Method: 1) critical analysis of the evidence on which the recommendations in an American practical guideline are based, and the impact of its application in our country; 2) analysis of the validity of clinical trials that provide the grounds for a recent European guideline.
Results: using the American guideline in our country proved that despite 89% of the indications corresponded to cases where there is general agreement and/or evidence/opinion in favor of its relevance, 23.6% of patients had normal coronary arteries. Randomized clinical trials supporting the European recommendations are not valid, in spite of their being regarded as recommendations based on best quality evidence.
Conclusions: even if practice guidelines developed by organizations in other countries may be valuable, it is not convenient to transfer them directly to our country without a critical analysis of the studies supporting their recommendations and without complementing this information with national evidence and the opinion of local experts in those areas where there is no evidence arising from the relevant studies.

References

(1) World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000. Health systems: improving performance. Disponible en: www.who.int/whr/2000/en/. Consulta: 4 noviembre 2009.
(2) Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC Jr. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines.
(3) Consensos. Sociedad Uruguaya de Cardiología. Disponible en: www.suc.org.uy/consensos.htm. Consulta: 4 noviembre 2009.
(4) Técnicas médicas, Disponible en: http://www.fnr.gub.uy/?q=node/197. Consulta: 4 noviembre 2009.
(5) Fondo Nacional de Recursos. Publicación Técnica N° 6 - Memoria 2007. Montevideo: Fondo Nacional de Recursos, 2008. Disponible en: www.fnr.gub.uy/sites/default/files/FNR-Memoria2007.pdf. Consulta: 4 noviembre 2009.
(6) Pereda G, López G, Perendones M, Pandiana A, Pazos M, Bagattini JC, et al. Congreso Nacional de Medicina Interna, 32.
(7) American College of Cardiology Foundation. American Heart Association. Methodology Manual for ACC/AHA Guideline Writing Committees, 2006.
(8) American College of Cardiology. American Heart Association. ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina).
(9) Rouleau JL, Moyé LA, Pfeffer MA, Arnold JM, Bernstein V, Cuddy TE, et al. A comparison of management patterns after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. N Engl J Med 1993; 328(11): 779-84.
(10) Tu JV, Pashos CL, Naylor CD, Chen E, Normand SL, Newhouse JP, et al. Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med 1997; 336(21): 1500-5.
(11) Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA 2009; 301(8): 868-9.
(12) van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008; 29(23): 2909-45.
(13) Di Mario C, Dudek D, Piscione F, Mielecki W, Savonitto S, Murena E, et al.
(14) Fernández-Avilés F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A, Vázquez N, Blanco J, Alonso-Briales J, et al.
(15) Le May MR, Wells GA, Labinaz M, Davies RF, Turek M, Leddy D, et al. Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46(3): 417-24.
(16) Commonwealth Foundation. A high performance health system for the United States: an ambitious agenda for the next President. Disponible en: www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/Publications/Fund-Reports/2007/Nov/A-High-Performance-Health-System-for-the-
United-States–An-Ambitious-Agenda-for-the-Next-President.aspx. Consulta: 4 noviembre 2009.
(17) Boden W, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan P, Maron D, Kostuk W, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356(15): 1503-16.
(18) Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in medicare spending. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138(4): 273-98.

Published

2009-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Sandoya E. Clinical practice guidelines: Looking for evidence. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2009 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Oct. 18];25(4):239-48. Available from: https://revista.rmu.org.uy/index.php/rmu/article/view/454

Most read articles by the same author(s)