Examen proctológico y tacto rectal en el diagnóstico clínico de síntomas anorrectales

César E.  Canessa

Authors

César E. Canessa Universidad de la República, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital de Clínicas, Departamento Clínico de Cirugía, Profesor Agregado. Hospital Evangélico, Policlínica de Proctología

Keywords:

DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, RECTAL DISEASES, ANUS DISEASES

Abstract

Objective:to evaluate the information provided by the proctological examination, and in particular, the rectal exam in patients with anorectal symptoms.
Method: patients referred to a proctology polyclinic from January 2005 through December 2008 were included in the study. We recorded demographic data, main symptom for consultation and clinical diagnosis. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of perianal examination, rectal examination and anoscopy for each pathology. The information obtained through the different maneuvers was classified into three categories: 1) it provided enough information to establish the primary clinical diagnosis; 2) it provided diagnostic information, although not conclusive; and 0) it failed to provide diagnostic information.
Results: 606 patients were included (319 women, 52%), average age was 47 years old, (range 14 to 93 years old). The most frequent symptom was anal pain (33%), followed by rectal bleeding (19%) and procidentia (18%). We performed a primary clinical diagnosis in 94% of patients; perianal examination and anoscopy provided enough information for diagnosis in 54% and 51% of cases respectively, whereas the rectal examination did so in 10% of cases.
Conclusion: the study showed that a complete proctological examination enables a primary clinical diagnosis in most patients who consulted for anorectal symptoms. Over half of the pathological conditions may be evidenced by means of a correct examination and perianal palpation. Rectal exam was the maneuver that obtained the least diagnostic performance, only allowing for a primary clinical diagnosis in 10% of the consultations.

References

(1) Hennigan TW, Franks PJ, Hocken DB, Allen-Mersh TG. Rectal examination in general practice. BMJ 1990; 301(6750): 478-80.
(2) Ng DP, Mayberry JF, McIntyre AS, Long RG. The practice of rectal examination. Postgrad Med J 1991; 67(792): 904-6.
(3) MacLeod JH. The proctologic examination-a guide. Calif Med 1971; 114(1): 7-11.
(4) Quaas J, Lanigan M, Newman D, McOsker J, Babayev R, Mason C. Utility of the digital rectal examination in the evaluation of undifferentiated abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27(9): 1125-9.
(5) Manimaran N, Gallan RB. Significance of routine digital rectal examination in adults presenting with abdominal pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004; 86(4): 292-5.
(6) Dixon JM, Elton RA, Rainey JB, Macleod DA. Rectal examination in patients with pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. BMJ 1991; 302(6773): 386-8.
(7) Thumbe V, Iqbal M, Bhalerao S. Accuracy of digital rectal examination in the estimation of height of rectal lesions. Tech Coloproctol 2007; 11(2): 111-3.
(8) Le Normand L, Joguet E. Comment je fais un toucher rectal? Pelv Perineol 2008; 3(1): 71-3.
(9) Martínez-Ramos D, Nomdedéu-Guinot J, Artero-Sempere R, Escrig-Sos J, Gibert-Gerez J, Alcalde-Sánchez M, et al. Estudio prospectivo para evaluar la precisión diagnóstica en enfermedad anal benigna en atención primaria. Aten Primaria 2009; 41(4): 207-12.
(10) Balkissoon R, Blossfield K, Salud L, Ford D, Pugh C. Lost in translation: unfolding medical students' misconceptions of how to perform a clinical digital rectal examination. Am J Surg 2009; 197(4): 525-32.
(11) Lawrentschuk N, Bolton DM. Experience and attitudes of final-year medical students to digital rectal examination. Med J Aust 2004; 181(6): 323-5.
(12) Springall RG, Todd IP. General practitioner referral of patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms. J R Soc Med 1988; 81(2): 87-8.
(13) Kemple T. Rectal examination in general practice. BMJ 1990; 301(6753): 667-8.