Enteroparasitary contamination of flies captured in the Palavecino Municipality, Lara State, Venezuela, 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29193/rmu.34.4.4Keywords:
FLIES, PARASITES, CONTAMINATION, VENEZUELAAbstract
Introduction: the lack of studies in Venezuela that demonstrate the importance of flies of medical interest as mechanical vectors of enteroparasites, motivated the realization of this crosssectional descriptive work, with intentional sample, where with plastic and ecological traps, adults of flies were captured.
Materials and methods: the specimens were inactivated, to be classified by gender, washed with 0.85% saline, separated from the solution and then centrifuged 10 min at 3000 rpm, to later use the pellet, which was mounted between lamina and lamella to observe the sediment under a microscope.
Results: 1.061 adults of flies were captured, which corresponded taxonomically to the genera: Phaenicia sp (29,2%), Blepharicnema splendens (6,4%), Cochliomyia hominivorax (3,8%), Musca domestica (3,4), Sarcophaga sp; (3%), Cochliomyia macellaria (2,5%) and the sum of other species (51,7%), such that from more than seven species of flies were able to identify the enteroparasites: Blastocystis sp, Endolimax nana, Entamoeba hartmanni , Entamoeba histolytica/dispar, Entamoeba coli, Iodamoeba butschlii, Pentatrichomonas sp (Trichomonas sp), while the only helminths obtained were Uncinarias (Anquilostomideos).
Conclusions: the enteroparasitic contamination of more than seven species of flies with seven species of enteroparasites diagnosed highlights the role of these dipterous transmitters in the cycle of enteric parasites.
References
(1) Muñoz D, Rodríguez R. Agentes bacterianos y parasitarios en adultos de la mosca común Musca domestica recolectadas en el Peñón, Estado Sucre, Venezuela. Rev Cient 2015; 25(2):159-66.
(2) Rocha M, Fariam S, Teshima E, Bardoni A. Insalubridade ambiental e aspectos sociais associados a patógenos intestinais isolados de dípteros. Eng Sanit Ambient 2011; 16(1):83-90.
(3) Quiceno J, Bastidas X, Rojas D, Bayona M. La mosca doméstica como portador de patógenos microbianos, en cinco cafeterías del norte de Bogotá. Rev UDCA Actual Divulg Cient 2010; 13(1):23-9.
(4) Mariluis J, Lagar M, Bellegarde E. Diseminación de enteroparásitos por Calliphoridae (Insecta, Diptera). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1989; 84(4):349-51.
(5) Cárdenas M, Martínez R. Protozoarios parásitos de importancia en salud pública transportados por Musca domestica Linnaeus en Lima, Perú. Rev Peru Biol 2004; 11(2):149-53.
(6) Castillo C, Castro M, Carhuapoma C, Castro H, Castro R, Chambi J. Parásitos de importancia en Salud Pública transportados por Musca domestica: Lima-Perú. CIMEL 2008; 13(2):49-53.
(7) Antunes Barros L, Huber F. Frequência de moscas (Diptera, Cyclorrapha) de importância médico veterinária no zoológico da Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Brasil. Parasitol Día 1999; 23(1-2):53-6.
(8) Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. Manual para el control de la mosca del gusano barrenador del ganado: Cochliomyia hominivorax (Coquerel). Roma: FAO, 1993. v.1.
(9) Cova-García P. Moscas de Venezuela. Caracas: La Cromatográfica, 1964.
(10) Díaz A. Análisis geoespacial de especies de la familia Calliphoridae (Diptera) en Venezuela. (Tesis de Grado). Valencia, Venezuela: Universidad de Carabobo, 2017.
(11) Pappas G, Roussos N, Falagas M. Toxoplasmosis snapshots: global status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and implications for pregnancy and congenital toxoplasmosis. Int J Parasitol 2009; 39(12):1385-94.
