Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs)

Experience with IR-DRG in the Sanatorio Americano, FEMI

Authors

  • Elbio Paolillo Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Dirección Técnica, Adjunto
  • Uruguay Russi Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Director Técnico
  • Daniela Cabrera Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Gerente General
  • Lucy Martins Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Gerente Comercial
  • Alberto Scasso Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Médicos Codificación Clínica
  • María Constantin Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Médicos Codificación Clínica
  • Martín Ferreira Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Administración de Servicios de Salud, Residente
  • Francisco Flores Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Informática Médica
  • Diego Genta Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Técnico Registros Médicos
  • Julio Álvarez Uruguay, Sanatorio Americano, Presidente del Directorio

Keywords:

DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS, INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES, ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY, PRIVATE HOSPITALS, LENGTH OF STAY

Abstract

Introduction: the provision for health care services, at the health centers, concentrates most of the resources paid by the health systems and, learning about the productivity of hospitals is essential for the clinical and administrative management. What hospitals produce is referred to as "hospital product".
Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) are one of the Patient Classification Systems (PCS) more widely used to measure the hospital product.
Information in the medical records of each patient constitutes the source for these classification groups, which comprise a wide range of systems and relate patients’ clinical features to the resources they consumed.
Objective: the purpose of this article is to describe the process for developing and implementing the application of IR-DRGs (International Refined DRGs) at the Sanatorio Americano and to reveal results obtained in the application of this system.
Method: we analyzed the discharges at the Sanatorio Americano that corresponded to patients coming from IAMC (Collective Health Care Institutions) belonging to FEMI (Uruguayan Medical Federation) and other institutions, which hospitalized these patients in the hospital between April-September, 2007.
Results: we obtained the DRGs of the 1,416 discharges, which resulted in 6,872 occupied bed days (OBD) in the different service modalities, with an average length of stay of 4.85 days.
Upon analysis, we found that we can introduce changes to the rendering of services in order to benefit all interested parties within the health care process: patients, referring institution and/or the institutions providing the services, in this case, Sanatorio Americano.
In other words, this means improving efficiency.
Conclusions: our main conclusions are that it is possible to implement the DRG system in our country, that it is a valid system to analyze and re-design the health care process, and that we can perform country- specific variations to the system that are innovative and provide good results, and that its use can be extended to other public and private institutions in our country.

References

(1) Macedo JC. Sobre la viabilidad-legitimidad del trabajo clínico: elementos para el diálogo. Compendio rev. med 1980; 2(2): 2-13.
(2) Donabedian A. La investigación sobre la calidad de la atención médica. Salud pública Méx 1986; 28: 324-7.
(3) Salvador Oliván J. Sistemas de información hospitalarios: el C.M.B.D. Scire 1997; 3 (2):115-30.
(4) Martínez Reina A. Clasificación mediante Grupos Relacionados con el Diagnóstico de pacientes diagnosticados de pancreatitis. Med Intensiva 2003; 27(2): 77-9.
(5) Casas M. Los sistemas de clasificación de pacientes. Conceptos básicos. In: Jiménez Jiménez J, ed. Manual de gestión para jefes de servicios clínicos. Madrid: Díaz de Santos, 1997: 289-301.
(6) Fetter RB, Shin Y, Freeman JL, Averill RF, Thompson JD. Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Med Care 1980; 18 (2 Suppl): 1-53.
(7) Los Grupos Relacionados de Diagnóstico (GRD) para ajustar los mecanismos de pago a los proveedores de los sistemas de salud.(CISS/WP/0512).In: Conferencia Interamericana de Seguridad Social (México, nov. 2005). Obtenido de: http://www.ciss.org.mx/pdf/es/estudios/CISS-WP-0512.pdf (Consulta: 5 may 2008).
(8) Averill R, Goldfield N, Steinbeck BA. Grupos Relacionados por el Diagnóstico (GRDs). 3M HIS/SIGESA, 1995.
(9) Vertress J. El uso de los grupos de diagnóstico relacionados como instrumento de financiación. In: España. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Análisis y desarrollo de los GRD en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Obtenido de: http://www.msc.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/docs/analisis.pdf (Consulta: 5 may 2008).
(10) Implantación de un sistema de información para la clasificación de pacientes y medición del producto hospitalario por GRD para los hospitales de ASSE. (Informe final, julio 2002). 3M Innovation. (No publicado)
(11) Peiró S. Métodos de medición de casuística y ajuste de severidad y riesgos. In: Gestión Clínica. Desarrollo e instrumentos. Madrid: Díaz de Santos, 2006: 145-200.
(12) Ortún Rubio V. Claves de gestión clínica. In: Ortún Rubio V, ed. Gestión clínica y sanitaria. Barcelona: Masson, 2003: 195-219.Obtenido de: http://www.econ.upf.edu/~ortun/publicacions/ chapClaves.pdf (Consulta: 5 may 2008).

Published

2008-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Paolillo E, Russi U, Cabrera D, Martins L, Scasso A, Constantin M, et al. Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): Experience with IR-DRG in the Sanatorio Americano, FEMI. Rev. Méd. Urug. [Internet]. 2008 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];24(4):257-65. Available from: https://revista.rmu.org.uy/index.php/rmu/article/view/519