Impact of indoor smoking bans on hospitalizations due to acute miocardial infarction in Uruguay
Keywords:
SMOKING CESSATION, TOBBACO SMOKE POLLUTION, MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONAbstract
Introduction: exposure to environmental tobacco smoke increases the risk for infarction in 31% among non-smokers. A decrease in hospital admission due to acute myocardial infarction was noticed in developed countries when indoor smoking was banned. The present study analyzed the impact of smoking bans on acute myocardial infarction in Uruguay, the first tobacco- smoke-free-country in the Americas.
Method: we conducted an ecological study that compared hospital admissions for infarction in the 24 months prior to March 2006 to admissions during the 24 months subsequent to that date (date when the anti-smoking regulation was passed, banning indoor public spaces). We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients residing in the country whose main diagnosis for admission was myocardial infarction. The statistic analysis was made by using the chi square test.
Results: 7,949 patients were admitted in the 37 participating institutions (66,4 ± 12,6 years old, 35,1% women), 4,346 were admitted over the two year period prior to the new measures, and 3,603 during the two-year period subsequent to the prohibition, what implied a 17.1% drop. The younger the patients, the greater the drop: <45years old: 38,5%; 45 to 64 years old: 14,8%; > 65 years old: 16,9%, p < 0,05. Admissions decreased by 24.2% on Fridays and Saturdays, and 14.3% from Sundays to Thursdays (p < 0,05). Decrease was 22.0% in private institutions and 6.3% in public institutions, p < 0,05.
Conclusions: Indoor smoking bans were associated to a decrease in hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction in our country, being this effect particularly important in the younger people. The benefit of this new legislation was more important on Fridays and Saturday and lower in those patients seen in the public sector.
References
(2) Barnoya J, Glantz SA. Cardiovascular effects of secondhand smoke: nearly as large as smoking. Circulation 2005; 111(20): 2684-98.
(3) Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 1995; 92(3): 657-71.
(4) United States Department of Health and Human Services. Centersfor Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, 2006.
(5) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Indoor air quality in hospitality venues before and after the implementation of a clean indoor air law - western New York, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004; 53(44): 1038-41.
(6) Sargent RP, Shepard RM, Glantz SA. Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban. BMJ 2004; 328(7446): 977-80.
(7) Glantz SA. Meta-analysis of the effects of smokefree laws on acute myocardial infarction: an update. Prev Med 2008; 47(4): 452-3.
(8) Pell JP, Haw S, Cobbe S, Newby DE, Pell AC, Fischbacher C, et al. Smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2008; 359(5): 482-91.
(9) Hyland A, Travers MJ, Dresler C, Higbee C, Cummings KM. A 32-country comparison of tobacco smoke derived particle levels in indoor public places. Tob Control 2008; 17(3): 159-65.
(10) United States Environmental Protection Agency. AQI Air Quality Index: a guide to air quality and your health. Disponible en: http://www.epa.gov/airnow/aqi_brochure_08-09.pdf. Consulta: 05 julio 2010.
(11) Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dirección General de Salud. División Epidemiología. Primera encuesta nacional de factores de riesgo de enfermedades crónicas no trasmisibles. Montevideo: MSP, 2009. Disponible en: http://www.msp.gub.uy/ucepidemiologia_2894_1.html. Consulta: 1 febrero 2009.
(12) Junta Nacional de Drogas, Centro para la Investigación de la Epidemia de Tabaquismo. Estudio nacional de prevalencia de tabaquismo en Uruguay 2007/2008. Disponible en: www.presidencia.gub.uy/_web/noticias/2008/11/2008111015.htm. Consulta: 1 febrero 2009.
(13) Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction, Jaffe AS, Apple FS, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007; 116(22): 2634-53.
(14) Callinan J, Clarke A, Doherty H, Kelleher C. Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Reviews, 2010; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub2.
(15) Lightwood JM, Glantz SA. Declines in acute myocardial infarction after smoke-free laws and individual risk attributable to secondhand smoke. Circulation 2009; 120(14): 1373-9.
(16) Meyers DG, Neuberger JS, He J. Cardiovascular effect of bans on smoking in public places: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54(14): 1249-55.
(17) Barone-Adesi F, Vizzini L, Merletti F, Richiardi L. Short-term effects of italian smoking regulation on rates of hospital admission for acute myocardial infartction. Eur Heart J 2006; 27(20): 2468-72.
(18) Cesaroni G, Forastiere F, Agabiti N, Valente P, Zuccaro P, Perucci CA. Effect of the Italian smoking ban on population rates of acute coronary events. Circulation 2008; 117(9): 1183-8.
(19) 19. Comisión Honoraria para la Salud Cardiovascular. Área Epidemiología y Estadística. Uruguay (2008): Proporción de muertes por causa cardiovascular en el total de defunciones. Disponible en: http://www.cardiosalud.org/epidemiologia/mortalidad-2008.pdf. Consulta: 10 julio 2010.
